Imperialism by any other name…still stinks

First in a series by guest author Dr. Dahlia Wasfi

Imperialism is defined as the policy of extending a nation’s authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations.

Map of Sykes-Picot territorial divisions

Sykes-Picot territorial divisions. Used under Creative Commons license.

The British Empire’s reign expanded through the invasion of 90% of the countries on planet Earth, including those of Western Asia (the “Middle East”).  This region remains riddled with violent strife.

Duplicity by the Allies during the World War I era is the root of the injustice and accompanying conflict that continues between Western Asia and Western powers. Today, the imperialist drives of the U.S. and NATO are continuing the bloodshed in this region for the sake of economic exploitation.

By 1916, British forces battling the armies of the Ottoman Empire in Mesopotamia were suffering great losses. Facing defeat, the Crown dispatched British Army officer Thomas Edward (T.E.) Lawrence—also known as “Lawrence of Arabia”—to ally the Arab tribes against their Ottoman rulers. Lawrence promised the native peoples their independence in return for fighting alongside the British. Lured by these guarantees of self-rule, indigenous leaders agreed.

The Arab Revolt of 1916-1918 was instrumental in the defeat of the Ottoman Empire. But the Allied Powers had their own desires to exploit the vast resources of the region. They never intended independence for the Arabs.

Beginning in 1915, representatives from France, England, and Russia conducted clandestine negotiations to divide up Ottoman territories—their anticipated spoils of war—among them. In May 1916, the final deal apportioning control of Arab lands to colonial powers was signed by British politician Sir Mark Sykes and French diplomat Francois Georges-Picot—just as T.E. Lawrence was promising Arabs their independence in exchange for their help.

The stealthy Sykes-Picot Agreement rendered the Crown’s guarantees of self-determination meaningless. (If only the Arabs could have consulted with the indigenous peoples of the Americas on what promises mean to European colonizers.)

(The next installment will discuss ongoing imperialism in the region today.)

Posted in Armed conflict, Understanding violence | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A father’s day for peace

The hype abounds and you are bound to know: June 16, the third Sunday in June, is Father’s Day. Long promoted by commercial interests, Father’s Day did not become an official holiday in the U.S. until 1972. Unlike Mother’s Day, it did not originate as a Father’s Day of Peace. But it could become one.

An Internet search for “mothers against war” provides a link for “Mothers Against War” and many similar links. Searching for “fathers against war,” however, provides links for “War Against Fathers,” which rails against the “feminization” of men.

Similarly, searching for “mothers against guns” leads to links for “Mothers Against Guns,” “Moms Against Guns,” and lots of similar links. But “fathers against guns” provides links to sites regarding views on guns from the U.S. founding fathers, a link to “Dads love lasers on guns,” and a suggestion that children buy a laser for Dad’s gun for Father’s Day.

On the brighter side, there’s a link to a Facebook page for 1,000,000 moms and dads against gun violence, which leads to a trailer for a powerful anti-gun violence film.

This Sunday, let us honor fathers who:

  • rear their children in love and security
  • refrain from spanking, beating, or terrorizing their children
  • promote nonviolence in their homes, their communities, and their countries
  • promote peace and social justice

Our country has provided some superb role models for fathers and father figures for peace, nonviolence, and social justice. Here are a few men and organizations that we will be honoring on Sunday:

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology

Posted in Champions of peace, Nonviolence | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hell holes in the U.S.

Guantanamo may be the most well-known symbol of government-sponsored torture of prisoners, but the horrors of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib take place right in your back yard—conveniently hidden in high-walled prisons.

Prison

Image in public domain.

In today’s post we provide some of the facts about torture in the U.S. prison system, along with links to articles and videos that document the torture and its horrendous effects.

 Facts

  • “The US incarcerates more people than any other country in the world, sometimes imposing very long sentences marred by racial disparities.” Human Rights Watch
  • Thousands of American prisoners are kept in solitary confinement, a state of extreme isolation and sensory deprivation, which is itself an extremely destructive form of torture.
  • Like the prisoners in Guantanamo, some prisoners are driven by desperation to stage hunger strikes to try to bring attention to their inhumane treatment.
  • A substantial number of the tortured prisoners, including the ones in solitary confinement, are youth under the age of 18.
  • Some of these children are girls
  • Their stories are heartbreaking—from child abuse by their families to child abuse in detention facilities.
  • Many of the prisoners are mentally ill. Instead of getting treatment, they get tortured. N.B. This video is very graphic and disturbing

Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch, the National Religious Campaign Against Torture, and Amnesty International work tirelessly to end torture, including in U.S. prisons. They deserve our thanks and support.

To learn more about torture in U.S. prisons, see Torture in Your Backyard, a powerful video from the National Religious Campaign Against Torture.

And read this report (opens in pdf) from the American Friends Service Committee.

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology

Posted in Human rights, Torture | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Arms for children

By guest author Luciana Karine de Souza

What does a society do when its children kill? This question became intensely personal in Brazil with the recent shooting death of a college student in São Paulo. The victim was 19 years-old; the shooter, 17.

Graffiti boy with gun

Seattle graffiti by bartleby78. Used under CC Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

Child and adolescent psychologists teach us that emotional stability, autonomy, and independence come with time and flourish when children develop secure attachments for the adults who care for them. But what happens when the adults providing children and adolescents with reciprocity, sensibility, monitoring, and so on, do so not for a humane education, but for crime education?

In today’s world, adolescents, and even children, are often introduced to guns early and taught how to engage in crime, drug trafficking, robbery, kidnapping, and even premeditated assassination. These firearms can provide not only money, but also prestige, attention, guidance, safety, and, in a way, some education (how to be brave and strong when shooting, how to be firm and clear when confronting).

When we study and teach the concept of attachment, we focus on the positive roles of reciprocity, sensibility, safety, proximity, and attention in child development.  To promote strong and secure attachment, we try to give our children love, embrace them with warmth, and surround them with our dedication. We offer them our arms and a safe haven. We strive to protect them, educate them, listen to them, and learn with them.

These arms, the arms of love, are the arms our children and adolescents need: arms to embrace them; safe and fulfilling arms; arms that protect them from violence, war, and hate. Not arms that kill. Not arms that fill the gap left by weak attachment. Arms that make them want to live and let live. No arms should be stronger.

Luciana Karine de Souza is a full professor at Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Her teaching and research involves personality and social development in psychology, education and leisure.

Posted in Children and war, Understanding violence, Weaponry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments