Our histories, ourselves. Part 1.

National Day of Mourning Plaque, Plymouth, MA. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

November is Native American History Month  (and they’re not over yet–not the month and not the history)

by Rev. Dr. Doe West

Seventy years ago, Native Americans could not vote.  A few weeks ago, two Native American/American Indian women created wave upon wave of celebration by achieving membership in the U.S. Congress. Are these the first Native Americans to take on this responsibility?

Not even close. Please open your minds and hearts to a little history:

  1. The first NA/AI member of Congress with recognized Tribal affiliation was elected in 1783.
  2.  A page in Wikipedia provides names and dates of previous NA/AI members of the U. S. Congress with documented tribal ancestry or affiliation. [
  3.  That list includes only members of tribes on the  48 contiguous states—not Hawaii, not Alaska. (As of now, no Alaska Natives have ever been elected or served.
  4. Upon the election of Sharice Davids of Kansas and Deb Halland of New Mexico, we will have four Native Americans serving in Congress in 2019; these new members join Tom Cole and Markwayne Mullin from Oklahoma.

Those elections are important historical events, but there are other histories of personal importance to me and thousands of others.

Here’s an example: In the 1790s,  Secretary of War Henry Knox said to President George Washington:

“How different it would be if instead of exterminating a part of the human race by our modes of population  we had persevered through all difficulties and at last had imparted our Knowledge of cultivating and the arts, to the Aboriginals of the Country by which the source of future life and happiness had been preserved and extended. But it has been conceived to be impracticable to civilize the Indians of North America – This opinion is probably more convenient than just.”*

Washington and Knox were “reformers” who helped propel the concept of “civilizing the savage”;  it is pretty clear to me that their intentions reflected moral reasoning. Unfortunately,  stories that begin with decent intentions often, inevitably, lead to devastating outcomes because the intentions are based on ignorance and prejudice. In this case, the “Kill the Savage and Save the Person” campaign began.

Native American Boarding Schools (aka Indian Residential Schools) were created to provide institutionalized enforcement of intentions to “civilize.” Children were not just torn from their families and tribal communities. They were also stripped of their indigenous cultural signifiers: external signifiers were destroyed by cutting  their hair and burning  their clothing; linqual signifiers by forbidding use of their native languages; and personal signifiers by replacing their true names with European names intended to “Christianize” as well as  “civilize” them.

The history of these schools yields proof of true savagery – sexual, emotional, physical, and mental abuse in these mostly in church-run schools. Doctrine and dogma were created by those in charge to meet their interpretation of what their religion would demand (just as is found today).

Genocide took many forms in the early history of the United States and  came close to eradicating the original people of our Nation.   There is no definitive list of Tribes that inhabited this land before colonization. There are official narratives, but there are also extinct tribes, loss of original language speakers, and destruction of dwellings and artifacts, without which it is difficult to create a true history. [lightly edited]

*lightly edited

Can you watch this trailer and do nothing?

by Kathie MM

Here’s the facts, ma’am.  Just the facts, sir. The crushingly vivid facts are available, but you don’t see them on the corporate media. Those  media serve the military-industrial complex, and the military-industrial complex benefits from death and destruction.  You don’t.  Nobody does in the long run.

Please watch the trailer again and again and ask yourself, “Can I really do nothing?  Can I turn a blind eye on the carnage my government is perpetrating in my name, in the phony names of peace and democracy? Can America be great while allowing a few powerful interests to profit from the murder of innocent men, women, and children elsewhere?” There is absolutely no moral justification for what is being done.

Watch the trailer.  Find and watch the whole film. Forward the links.  Search for the voices of peace.  Fight despair.  Identify and support the voices of peace.  Vote for the advocates of peace, the opponents of war.  You can do it and sleep better at night.

And if you need more facts, read Andrew Bacevich’s America’s War for the Greater Middle East.  Facing the facts is a bitter pill to swallow but if we don’t all take our medicine, the murderous epidemic being spread by the people in power who control our country and its resources will envelop everyone.

Unjustifiable wars and moral imperatives: Another veteran speaks out

Ross Caputi in Iraq.

by Michael J. Corgan

I am writing in response to the recent post on anti-war veteran activist, Ross Caputi.  I don’t consider myself a pacifist since I believe there will always be those who choose to resort to war for little or no good reason and others of us must deal with them.

However, sometimes we  ourselves are the ones who resort to war for little or no good reason; those of us who were in the military as a profession have a particular moral responsibility to speak out.

Like my longtime colleague Andy Bacevich, I am a service academy graduate and served several tours in wars whose justification was uncertain at best. Like him, I am most concerned about our propensity to get into wars for which there was no justification: Mexico in 1846, Spain in 1898,  Woodrow Wilson’s  Latin American invasions, Granada and Panama in 1982, Iraq in 2003, to name just the clearest cases.

At the Naval War College in the late 1970s we began the study of Thucydides and Clausewitz to try to determine why we, a supposed 1st-rate military power lost  to North Vietnam, a supposed 4th-rate military power.

From Thucydides one learns how easily the arrogance of power leads to foolish and disastrous military adventures in which many are killed for no worthy aim. From Clausewitz a more important lesson: know when to quit when you are not going to ‘win.’

What prompts my concern now is our war in Afghanistan, the longest war in our history.  According to New York Times interviews with commanders there,  we are farther from ‘winning’ than ever.

According to international law, we probably had justification for going to war after the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11; that group operated with either the acquiescence of the Taliban or the inability of the Taliban to prevent  use of their country as an operations base for the attackers. However, after 14 years, what is our justification for continuing a war that kills civilians and is no closer to being concluded than it ever was?

Five hundred years ago,  Mongols couldn’t control the land. Two hundred years ago,  the British began their futile attempt to control it. Then, in the last century, the Russians also failed. All that resulted was a lot of people dead.

Now, in our arrogance, we think we can create a stable country. How can we be effective nation builders when we are foreigners, don’t speak any of the languages, and are infidels. It  isn’t working. Meanwhile people who want no part of either side are dying. There needs to be a solution to problems in that unhappy land but we and our war aren’t providing it even with all our incredible precision weapons and dropping of the largest conventional bomb ever.

The only right thing to do is to extract ourselves and admit the final answer, if there is one, will be attained by those who live there. The moral imperative is that we must go home.

Michael J, Corgan is Associate Professor of Political Science at Boston University.