Psychology’s “Dark Triad” and the Billionaire Class, Part 2

by Roy Eidelson

Source: Roy Eidelson

Psychopathy

The second component of the Dark Triad — psychopathy — refers to a person’s lack of empathy toward others and a tendency to behave in a callous and uncaring manner toward them. Here too, research by psychologists supports the view that, compared to their “lower-class” counterparts, “upper-class” individuals act with less compassion — and also fall short on certain basic skills necessary for building positive connections with other people.

In one experiment, for example, lower-income participants were substantially more willing to take on extra work to help out a distressed research partner than were the upper-income participants. In another study, lower-class participants demonstrated a stronger compassion-related physiological response than did their upper-class counterparts after watching a video of children suffering from cancer. In a related study, the lower-class participants in a stressful interview process showed greater sensitivity and compassion toward their competitors than did the upper-class interviewees. And in an experiment with four-year-old children, those from less wealthy homes behaved more altruistically than those from wealthier homes, donating more of their prize tokens to children they were told were hospitalized.

In other studies, individuals from a lower social class were significantly better than upper-class participants at judging the emotions being portrayed when they were presented with photos of human faces. The researchers concluded that this enhanced ability may reflect the reality that those who are less well-off must rely more on accurately reading their social environment, because they depend more on interpersonal relationships and collaborative efforts in their daily lives. On the other hand, individuals with extensive material resources like today’s super-rich are more likely to find close relationships, especially with people of lesser means, quite unnecessary in their goal-oriented pursuits — and their perspective-taking abilities may suffer as a result.

In the business world, a compassion deficit among members of the billionaire class isn’t very hard to see. For example, rarely do we hear the CEOs of today’s corporate behemoths acknowledge the critical role that they themselves play in blocking upward mobility and financial security for millions of working-class Americans. Most obviously, union-busting and related “right-to-work” efforts suppress the wages and benefits that could dramatically improve the lives of working families. More broadly, despite substantial increases in worker productivity over the past few decades, the super-rich have directed the rewards of economic growth into their own pockets rather than into their employees’ paychecks. Likewise, international trade agreements, written in secret with strong corporate representation, have prioritized protecting profits for huge companies over safeguarding wages, human rights, and the environment. Perhaps this callousness is captured especially well by Amazon’s billionaire CEO Jeff Bezos, who reportedly once described his negotiating approach as similar to “the way a cheetah would pursue a sickly gazelle.”

Narcissism

The third trait of the Dark Triad — narcissism — refers to an individual’s sense of superiority over other people and convictions about personal entitlement to special treatment. Once again, in a diverse set of psychological studies, individuals of higher social class displayed greater levels of narcissism and entitlement than did their less wealthy counterparts.

In one study, for example, participants who rated themselves higher on a measure of socioeconomic status also scored higher on a scale designed to measure psychological entitlement; a sample item from that scale is “I honestly feel I’m just more deserving than others.” Another study instead used a nonverbal measure of entitlement. Participants looked at sets of circles of varying sizes and were asked to identify which size circle best described how they saw themselves compared to others. Those of higher social status picked larger circles as their self-descriptors than did those of lower social status. In a third study that used a behavioral measure of narcissism, upper-class participants were more likely than their lower-class counterparts to make use of a wall mirror before having their photos taken. In a survey study, researchers in Germany directly assessed a sample of very high net-worth individuals. They too found that this group scored higher on a measure of narcissism compared to a separate sample of people of lesser economic means.

In the board room and beyond, the narcissistic super-rich are accustomed to being in charge and to having things their way — unlike those they sometimes refer to as “the little people.” Of course, they don’t necessarily feel fortunate in this regard because, by their own account, they fully deserve all the benefits and privileges bestowed upon them. The special favors they receive are particularly apparent when we consider the corrupting influence of wealth on “equal justice under law,” the hallowed words engraved atop the Supreme Court Building in our nation’s capital. Indeed, unequal treatment runs the gamut from the likelihood of arrest and prosecution to the leniency offered in sentencing. As one example of these unwritten norms, wealthy tax cheats have developed a broad repertoire of arguments — based on notions of personal superiority — for why they should receive a light sentence or no sentence at all after being caught, prosecuted, and found guilty (all rarities in their own right). Their farfetched justifications — which some judges nevertheless find persuasive — include all of the following: they’ve already suffered sufficient public humiliation for their misdeeds; although they cheated, they’ve also been generous in their charitable donations; the fines they’ve paid were sufficiently punitive; and their status as “job creators” makes it unwise to remove them from the community and put them behind bars.

Note from KMM: Pegean says, Narcissism? Narcissist? Where have i heard those words before? Somewhere in this blog….

Let’s Tango

Silhouette of a couple dancing Tango. Author: Bleff. In the public domain.

 A Solution for Post-Election Blues And Celebrants: A Satire in Need of Reading

by Anthony J. Marsella

The world is in shock!  The anticipated outcome of the USA election did not occur. How is that possible? Everything had been set in place for a continuation of the existing Global Order, and the plans to continue to alter the Global Order in favor of those few privileged with wealth, power, position, and person. Now uncertainty! The possibility of an unsavory future for all!

The divisions became clear, hyped by a failed, flawed, and sinister media. Consider: (1) White, Black, Brown;(2) Male, Female, LGBT; (3) Young, Middle-Aged, Old, Very Old, and Unborn; (4) Refugees, Internally Displaced Humans, Immigrants, Homeless, Hopeless;(5) Humans, Animals, Insects, Flora; Urban, Suburban, Rural, Village, Survivalists. All were caught in contention, conflict, clash, and contradiction!

What could be done?  I thought about this for a few moments and came to this conclusion:  Everyone must learn to Tango not tangle! Yes, Tango! Inherent in the Tango are the very solutions the world urgently needs.

Consider the nature of the Tango:

Alchemy! Two as one!

Artistry in every movement!

Compelled and compulsory sensuality, sexuality!

Controlled passion!

Disciplined emotions!

Distant intercourse! (Better than distant learning)

Healing intensity!

Immediacy prayers!

Intimacy contact!

Ordered expression!

Tolerated yearning!

Enough, you get the idea! The Tango does things to dancers and viewers that need to be done to comfort, assuage, mollify, placate, and to enrage, arouse, provoke.

And then I got carried away with the possibilities.  World leaders and major players must dance the Tango with each other. Imagine Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton (Yes, yes, who is my partner?), Vladimir Putin, Netanyahu, Xin Jing Ping, President Rodrigo Duerte, Presidents of European nations (whoever is in office at this time or next week), corporate presidents, military officers,billionaires, Federal Reserve System members and leaders. The list is sizeable, but finite!

Please, before you proceed with this tale, click on this link and enter the moment.

Now, can you just imagine what would happen when Obama strides on to the floor, leaning slightly forward, arms at his side, to meet Putin, who is much in smaller height, but bigger in chest and ego. Obama asks courteously: “Who is dancing lead!”  Putin, more knowledgeable in tangles of all sorts, replies:  “Comrade, there is no lead in Tango! It is ecology!” “Oh yeah, of course! Just like climate change, and oil pipelines stuff,” Obama replies.

At this point, the music begins, the lights dim, and the world waits! A single violinist offers the first bars!  The dancers stare at each other, and say: “Do not step on my shoes!” They were made in Bangladesh! Then in an intimate whisper to each other, they both say:  “It is easier to make war than to dance this stuff.” In a poignant moment, both twist and snap their heads, as is required. “Ouch!” “Yy!” Drones circle overhead!

Politicians in Iceland decide the entire country will learn to Tango! “It will become our national dance!”And in Argentina, residents take to the streets dancing the Tango, restoring their soul, lost for years because of dictators. In Italy, people cry: “The Tango is like eating a stuffed artichoke.” The Greeks yell: “Oopla!” The Poles say the Tango is nice, but you can’t beat the Mazurka! Ghetto gangs in Chicago say: “Who needs order! We like the Krump! Everything moves at the same time.”

The Viennese, holding their coffee cups, say: “Nice but too passionate!  We prefer the Waltz.” Finns, slightly hesitant about proximity, clothes, and Russia, say: “Maybe it would be better if everyone sat in a sauna.”  And Whirling Dervishes in Turkey say: “If you added a few more spins, the Tango has possibilities.” And Strip Teasers in exotic girl bars say: I Tango with my pole! And in the Vatican, the Pope, does the Tango in the solitude of the Sistine Chapel; he recalls what he has missed with regret! And India tries to remind the others of their ancient Dancing Goddess, Shiva (Nataraja), and her cosmic dance of creation.  And in Silicon Valley, in the silence of the night, robots dance: “The Robot.”

And so it goes! Efforts after a common solution reveal, no matter how good the intention and the solution, it is hard for people to escape their conditioned preferences, habits, and comfort zones.  It is easier to keep the status quo.

A satire! Yes, of course! But hasn’t the world been forced to endure a satire at the hands of the world leader dance? Is it possible dancing the Tango could heal and bring reform?

And if you did not click on the link above, get into the spirit now and see what you missed.

Anthony J. Marsella, Ph.D., a  member of the TRANSCEND Network, is a past president of Psychologists for Social Responsibility, emeritus professor of psychology at the University of Hawaii, and past director of the World Health Organization Psychiatric Research Center in Honolulu. He is known nationally and internationally as a pioneer figure in the study of culture and psychopathology who challenged the ethnocentrism and racial biases of many assumptions, theories, and practices in psychology and psychiatry. In more recent years, he has been writing and lecturing on peace and social justice. He has published 15 edited books, and more than 250 articles, chapters, book reviews, and popular pieces. He can be reached at marsella@hawaii.edu.

11/9/2016