Zinn Zingers: Right Then, Right Now

The Women Disobey protest against US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) “zero tolerance” policy separation children and families at the US/Mexico border. 28 June 2018. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Author: Sarahmirk .

By Kathie MM

Believers in peace and human rights are reeling from national symptoms of fascism, racism, and  violent responses to engineered fear and misdirected rage–and now on top of everything else, an opening in the Supreme Court.

But, there’s an antidote to despair in The Progressive’s  2005 article from Howard Zinn.

Here are a few excerpts, reminding us: we have overcome before–and can do so again.

“It would be naive to depend on the Supreme Court to defend the rights of poor people, women, people of color, dissenters of all kinds. Those rights only come alive when citizens organize, protest, demonstrate, strike, boycott, rebel, and violate the law in order to uphold justice….

The rights of working people, of women, of black people have not depended on decisions of the courts. Like the other branches of the political system, the courts have recognized these rights only after citizens have engaged in direct action powerful enough to win these rights for themselves….

Knowing the nature of the political and judicial system of this country, its inherent bias against the poor, against people of color, against dissidents, we cannot become dependent on the courts, or on our political leadership. Our culture–the media, the educational system–tries to crowd out of our political consciousness everything except who will be elected President and who will be on the Supreme Court, as if these are the most important decisions we make. They are not. They deflect us from the most important job citizens have, which is to bring democracy alive by organizing, protesting, engaging in acts of civil disobedience that shake up the system. That is why Cindy Sheehan’s dramatic stand in Crawford, Texas, leading to 1,600 anti-war vigils around the country, involving 100,000 people, is more crucial to the future of American democracy than [particular judicial hearings and appointments]…”

There’s gold in them there words.  Keep the faith. Heed the call.

Getting to Better Signs

https://youtu.be/Y_TFGYV35zQ

In response to my last post, “Getting to Good“, several engaging peace readers sent  photos of signs displayed at the counter-rally on Boston Commons last Saturday, when members of a number of social justice groups faced off against the group rallying on behalf of “free speech.” This rally and counter-rally were responses to the  August 12 violence at a White Nationalist rally in Charlottesville, VA.

Consider the signs in these photos.  To what extent do you think they can be effective if their goal is to promote nonviolent anti-racist activism?  Are some better than others?  Which ones? Why?  Have you seen anti-racism signs that you think are more effective than these might be?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

To me, these signs serve their purpose more effectively than other banners I saw full of curses.  I am definitely not convinced that blazoning the F word on an anti-anything placard helps any cause .

Moreover, when the cause is one in which I believe, like the fight against racism (or environmental devastation or hunger), it distresses me that the advocates for these causes cannot conceive of a more civil manner to promote their goals. Where is the evidence that expletives resolve conflicts?

And are the bearers of hateful anti-racism placards really supporters of equal rights, social justice, and peace, or are they mostly trouble-makers, spoilers, infiltrators?

Again, I would love to have you submit your views on these questions. Thank you.