Seeking War No More

By Edward Agro

Given that an antiwar movement in the U.S., where rampant militarism is the norm, must cast its nets impossibly wide, it’s no wonder that the nonviolent struggle to build a world without war draws proponents from every class and predisposition of American Life.  But what glues together all of us who resist?  Is there a tradition which can give us strength?

Professor Lawrence Rosenwald’s ambitious book ”War No More” helps us find that tradition. It’s not your standard history, focused on well-recognized heroes – usually military – who purportedly single-handedly “make peace” – usually by military means.  Instead it’s a picaresque ramble through three centuries of efforts by individuals, in many cases unknown to history, to celebrate in writing, song, and graphics and often putting their peace and quiet, if not more, on the line to defeat The Juggernaut of militarism that affects and stains all that is good in the American experiment.  Reading these stories will be a great encouragement to modern day activists in the antiwar cause.  And, somewhat like Howard Zinn’s “People’s History of the United States,” it will encourage citizens just awakening to their need to resist.

But if the cause is ponderous, the book is not; I found these 800-plus pages a joy to read.  The thing is so rich that gulping it down all at once is not the only way to extract its treasures.  Rosenwald’s prefatory notes to the selections are a great read in themselves;  they give a good deal of the historical contexts, and though the author refrains from haranguing the reader, they give a  sense of his own passionate conviction.

The selections themselves bring many surprises. Reading the selection “Wailing Shall Be in All Streets” shows the early attempt that finally after many years gave birth to “Slaughterhouse-Five.” There are a number of such discoveries; I’ll let the reader of “War No More” have the pleasure of discovering others.

Even the unknown indexer of this book deserves credit: one can profitably read the index to get another overview of the history of antiwar and nonviolent action.

Of course, no one volume can encompass the totality of the antiwar tradition of America – there’s just too much, and it comes from too many directions, conservative as well as liberal, radically passionate as well as logically argued.

Which brings up the question “War No More” begs us to answer: there has been so much effort and attention given to the struggle against militarism throughout American history, yet where is a generally recognized tradition within which we can find our home?  Perhaps reading “War No More” will be one of the ways conscientious citizens can find or build such a tradition; maybe the tradition will come to be what we celebrate the 4th of July.  One can only hope, and work.

The foregoing is a condensation of a longer review of “War No More,” which appears on Amazon.com

Nonviolent activism: Engine of change, part 2

Second and final essay reviewing Recovering nonviolent history: Civil resistance in liberation struggles. Edited by Maciej J.  Bartkowski.  Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2013 (US).

Reviewed by Ed Agro

To what extent are the lessons from Recovering nonviolent history applicable to different times and situations? The book deals with struggles against colonial overlords, compradors, or outright tyrants. The people were under-served and unrepresented; rulers had the lion’s share of military and economic power.

Yet the question for U.S. activists is not how to overthrow the “other,” but rather: Can strategic nonviolence also curb the misbehavior of democracies?

From Dictatorship to DemocracyGene Sharp’s answer to this question is “No.” In functioning democracies (that is, prior to elites taking everything), autonomy and wealth are still diffused widely. Few people will sacrifice what they already have on behalf of communal change.

Here are two of many questions that might help us get beyond that “No.”

1.  What’s ordinary? A number of Bartkowski’s chapters characterize the struggle as between ordinary people and the oppressing group. While the oppressor and its aims are well-defined, we don’t get a picture of what “ordinary people” means. When supporters of a regime come over to the civil resistance, do they thereby become ordinary? Were they not ordinary before?

Assuming “ordinary people” to be self-evident hinders the understanding of how one person will go beyond mere opinion to sacrifice for the communal good while a neighbor will struggle as mightily to maintain the most bogus privilege.

2.  In ignoring the stories’ contexts do we exchange the myth of war heroics for one of heroic comity? For example, the chapter on the U.S. in 1765-75 makes a persuasive argument that civil resistance might have effected autonomy, if not independence, without war. Readers unaware of the pre-war violence by the patriots could take away a picture of a population in accord on the reasons and method to effect change. Was this so? How might our understanding of democracy differ had we a fuller picture?

These are not criticisms of Bartkowki’s book, but rather tokens of its richness. Right action is not obvious, even in a democracy.

Ed Agro is a long-time peace activist. To learn more about Ed, read his autobiographical statement, as published in Forbes Magazine.

Nonviolent activism: Engine of change, Part 1

Recovering nonviolent history: Civil resistance in liberation struggles. Edited by Maciej J.  Bartkowski. Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2013 (US).

Reviewed by Ed AgroRecovering Nonviolent History

This volume will interest anyone who is curious about the history of nonviolent activism and its prospects as an engine of change. The book shows in some detail the birth, development, and fate of little-known (or unknown) nonviolent liberation struggles in 17 countries. The aim is to counterbalance national histories that heroize violence and discount the nonviolent activism that preceded and/or paralleled armed struggle.

The editor and chapter authors are “engaged academics” in the field of peace studies; some were intimately involved in the activism they describe or are inheritors of that activism. In the introduction Bartkowski outlines the importance of these stories for peace studies; in his concluding chapter he draws lessons for those not only studying, but also actively pursuing, peace activism.

The tactics described will be familiar to those who have read Gene Sharp’s studies of strategic nonviolence (From dictatorship to democracy: A conceptual framework for liberation). What’s new here is the explicit recognition of how culture-dependent the expression of those tactics is. In fact, the first reading of the book can be difficult, because from chapter to chapter one has to reorient oneself to different modes of expression.

All peoples desire the same autonomy and dignity; all have discovered the same tools of struggle; yet each re-forges them suitably for their own culture. For example, the description of the Egyptian struggles for a nation-state between 1805 and 1922 are, despite different times and mores, similar to tactics used in the Egyptian revolt (Arab Spring) of 2011. Astoundingly, they also read like a description of Occupy Wall Street.

These convergences are partly due to historical memory and the worldwide intercommunication of activists; but they are also due to the rediscovery of the common principles underlying nonviolent resistance and nonviolent citizenship.

From this book I get the sense that there’s hope yet.

Ed Agro is a long-time peace activist. To learn more about Ed, read his autobiographical statement, as published in Forbes Magazine.

Conscription of our money for war (Don’t wanna pay for war no more, Part 2)

[Second in a series by guest author Ed Agro.]

Anti-war protest
Photo by Bill Hackwell

Thinking about the conscription of our money for war led me to recognize that modern America’s wars are waged mostly in behalf of an addiction to well-nigh mindless consumption without concern for true costs, the “externalities” beloved by those economists who labor to convince us that we live in a world of infinite plenty; that is, in heaven.

The earth is small, and what it has to give is limited. The more it’s depleted, the more fiercely nations and corporations compete to be the ones to gouge it.

We don’t have to be the gluttons amongst the 1% in order to take part in the fouling of our nest. All we have to be are ordinary folk, accepting the ordinarily assumed right to take and to have without the burden of considering the consequences to anything beyond our wallets.

Over time these thoughts led me to a life of less stuff, less interest in leaping to buy whatever was offered. There was no struggle or heroism about this clearing of the decks, it just seemed to be a part of sensible living.

Yet diligent downward mobility was accompanied by a continual reduction in my tax liability. I was still a fan of paying for public good while refusing to pay for public evil, and still wanted to savor the contradiction of doing both at once.

Awhile ago it reached the point that the only war tax available to me was the phone tax. It’s gone up and down since it was first imposed, most often going up to meet the financing requirements of this or that war. There’s more than a little justification for calling it a dedicated war tax.

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison: Ed has provided us with an example of how one anti-war activist decided to signal and continue signaling his resistance to war. What is your view of his decision? To what extent do you think he can promote public good while refusing to pay for public evil? Have you found other ways to express your distress over war?]