As protests by millions continue (Quaker reflections, Part 1)

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison:  Today we welcome guest author Jean Gerard, a long-term Quaker pacifist and activist, who worked for the Nuclear Freeze Movement, Women Strike for Peace, and Sane, among other anti-war and pro-peace activities. This is the first of several posts containing her reflections on current and historical trends in peace activism.]

Moroccan protests
Moroccan protest photo by Magharebia; used under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license

Over a period of little more than a year, several national movements in the Middle East have succeeded in displacing dictators, bringing one into an international court of justice.  In other nations authoritarian resistance has been more invulnerable.

The ultimate results are not yet clear as protests by millions continue in spite of great loss of life.

“Occupy Wall Street” was undoubtedly encouraged by these massive protests of young jobless Middle Eastern revolutionists. Beginning  first in New York City, Occupy Wall Street spread rapidly across the country –  “occupying” many public spaces from coast to coast.

As winter weather made camping outdoors more difficult and groups living temporarily in public spaces were ousted by police forces, the movement has temporarily fallen out of media attention, but is still functioning in a reflective mode, waiting for spring.

General “liberal” opinion is that the movement will re-emerge better organized and focused. I, like many others, wait with desperate anticipation, for I am deeply engaged in its success.

Most of my life I have worked for peace and justice causes. I taught college classes in both California and Japan, and tried to prod students into learning about and understanding the world and its many problems.

Despite efforts by teachers and community organizers everywhere, the problems have seemed to worsen and we see too little evidence of positive change. Over-population, rapid technological development, environmental hazards, successive wars one after another, and lagging support for public education have continued for so long that problems have blown up in all our faces.

Even the smallest and most remote of human groups are now brought so close together that they are drawn into conflict faster than they can understand what is happening.

 

We resolve to do more

Monday, October 24, 2011, was United Nations Day.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. Image used under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

“UN Day is a day on which we resolve to do more. More to protect those caught up in armed conflict, to fight climate change and avert nuclear catastrophe; more to expand opportunities for women and girls, and to combat injustice and impunity; more to meet the Millennium Development Goals.”

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
Message on UN Day, 24 October 2011

The Millennium Development Goals established in 2010 with an achievement goal of 2015, are: 1) end poverty and hunger; 2) achieve universal education; 3) promote gender equality and empower woman; 4) reduce child mortality; 5) improve maternal health; 6) combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases; 7) ensure environmental sustainability, and 8) develop a global partnership for economic development.

None of these goals have been achieved yet in the United States. In what ways has involvement in wars interfered with achieving those basic goals in this relatively rich nation? In what ways is it in the interest of Americans to work towards these goals, not just at home but around the world?

As always, the question is, how can one individual make a difference? In an earlier post, Alan O’Hare discussed the importance of sharing stories.  In response to the fact that the world population is about to reach 7 billion, the UN Population Fund has undertaken an initiative called 7 Billion Actions, gathering the stories of individuals and organizations around the world striving to make a positive difference in the world.

And for a wonderful fictional film on one individual fighting to make a difference, watch this excerpt from the film “The Girl in the Café”:

 

A new way of thinking

The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-century American politics with an 18th century brain, by George Lakoff

Book review by Kathie Malley-Morrison and Sarah Bleicher, student of linguistics and international studies at Boston College. (Sarah took Psychology of War and Peace with Kathie Malley-Morrison at Boston University this summer.)

Upon reading the introduction of George Lakoff’s The Political Mind, one may feel that brainwashing will ensue. Lakoff calls for a “New Enlightenment,” a new way of thinking, and for “changing minds.”

He explains how the brain shapes the political mind, how politics challenge the 21st century mind, and how old ways of thinking left over from the Enlightenment era are used—ineffectively—by neoliberals who think you can change people’s thinking by presenting them with facts.

In this book, Lakoff cites a number of  studies in support of his argument that human beings are emotional in ways that affect how they think about issues of values and morality. He argues that the combination of particular emotions with particular ideas can create synaptic bonds in the brain that in turn shape responses to those ideas and similar ideas.

According to Lakoff, human beings are not completely rational, and ideas with a strong emotional component (e.g., the extent to which wars are necessary and can be won) are influenced not just by information but by how they are framed, the language in which they are embedded, and the effects of that language on the brain.

This book provides a rich perspective on how cognitive science, politics, language, and experiences in the family and the broader society all work together in ways that can have a fundamental influence on political thought. Lakoff’s theories are mostly directed at helping progressives argue and debate more effectively in trying to counter the messages of conservatives; however, I think many of Lakoff’s ideas can be used to promote peace and a better world.

Specifically, I think we should consider the applications of his theories to peace building and peace education. Lakoff is quite convincing in his arguments concerning the tactics used by conservatives to influence political thinking; why shouldn’t peace educators use similar principles in framing the values of peace in a way that will energize people to work for peace?

Kathie Malley-Morrison and Sarah Bleicher

Proposal: International Day for Apology and Forgiveness

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison: Today we welcome another contribution by our guest author, Dr. Majed Ashy.]

This past Memorial Day, like all Memorial days, is a good day to remember the fallen
soldiers, and an opportunity to contemplate –as individuals, communities, and
nations– ways to cultivate peace and reduce war casualties and suffering.

There are groups that have promoted the idea of an International Day of Forgiveness and a Global Day of Forgiveness.

I believe that there is an international need for an increase in education and awareness regarding apology as well as forgiveness and their roles in personal, social, and international relations.

An organization in the U.S. asked me to write a comment regarding President Obama’s speech in Cairo. In the comment I suggested the establishment of an International Day for Apology and Forgiveness. During this day, schools can discuss the roles of apology and forgiveness, do workshops on how to apologize accurately, and discuss various issues related to forgiveness.

It can be also a day for the media to present films and programs related to the topic. The United Nations and the member states might hold meetings and discussions on the roles of apology and forgiveness in world peace. States might offer apologies regarding past errors they did.

In addition, during this day, people might have the opportunity to apologize and forgive. Research showed that sometimes people are willing to apologize and forgive but they need an environment that is suitable for that–an environment that supports a peaceful mental state, and a social context that deeply understands the importance of apology and forgiveness for human progress.

Establishing such a day might contribute to such an understanding.

Majed Ashy, Ph.D., assistant professor of psychology at Merrimack College and research fellow in psychiatry at McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School