Militarize police against terrorists? Bad idea.

 

Tom Zbikowski, Fort Walton Beach, Fla., Police Department SWAT team member, walks the hallways in Campbell Township Elementary School at the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center, Butlerville, Ind., while portraying an active shooter during the 2015 Air Force Research Laboratory Commanders Challenge, June 15-19. Four members from the SWAT team participated in the challenge playing the role of emergency responders in addition to the active shooter. (U.S. Air Force photo by Wesley Farnsworth)

Whether you are a privileged student in a good university, a parent of small children, a kid, a grandmother, or any of the other types of ordinary people in this country, you should be worried about the increasing militarization of the police.

The police are human beings. That means they are subject to all kinds of influences, just like everybody else; for some of them, their families, their communities, and the media to which they have been exposed have made them angry, frightened, violent, hateful, bigoted.  These traits are pretty scary in anyone, but particularly in people with guns.  Especially big guns, rapidly firing guns, guns with no brains or morals.

And because they are human, police can also make mistakes. Huge mistakes.

You all know about Ferguson, Missouri, and similar nationally-recognized episodes starring militarized police but even Ferguson has its less well known stories.

There are probably thousands of other examples of police misuse of their increasingly militarized power—and the limited sanctions that ensue from their misuse– that led to tragedy.

For example, read this brief TruthOut article for five really outrageous examples of SWAT raids gone wrong.

As is true of so many social problems, efforts are being made to rein in the abuses of a militarized police force .

If enough people become involved, perhaps we can reduce the progress towards 1984 in 2015 and beyond.

 

It’s indecent for these guys to share a bed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH25VEmWLmo&feature=player_embedded

Cool, huh? An 11-man SWAT team, heavily armed, yelling, swearing, breaking in an open door, and throwing flash bang grenades, raids a house and (pant, pant) captures a 68-year-old grandmother and her adopted daughter. Whoops, wrong house.

Viewing this video really steamed me up. It was another unneeded reminder of the issues that obsess me everyday anyway. Militarization of police. Unnecessary force. Guns, guns, guns. Violation of civil rights. Violation of human rights. Inhumane behavior.

But the steam that built up in me was nothing compared with the sense of outrage, disbelief, and anger I felt when I watched this second brief video, a newscast report by a member of the local TV network invited to come along with the SWAT team and see them in action.

What happened to the free press? David Shepherd, the so-called reporter for this story, seems more like the “bought press,” or the “seduced press.” Here is a blatant example of what can happen when people whose job it is to report the news become “embedded” in the action.

I was less steamed and could only laugh when I read a report on the raid in Police: The Law Enforcement Magazine, entitled “Ind. SWAT Team Tricked Into Raiding Grandma’s Home”. The moral of the story seems to be that the raid, the intimidation, the destruction of property was not the fault of the police who did those things. They were tricked into it.

A lot of people in this country go nuts in response to particular forms of coupling (white with black, men with men, etc.) It is the increasing tendency of coupling between members of the press  and gun-bearing members of the power structure that makes me nervous.

The good news is that the grandmother filed a law suit and the judge ruled that the SWAT team does not get immunity from prosecution.

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology

Bang, bang, you’re dead, Part 1

Children and teen gun death rate per 100,000. Data source: The Horrific Risk Of Gun Violence For Black Kids In America, In 4 Charts. By The Huffington Post. 19 August 2014. Author: Delphi234. Made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Stop, look, and bristle with anger at the image above.  The obscene rates at which American children are gunned down or left with life-altering physical and psychological scars from gun violence should horrify and activate us all.

What’s the story, anyway?  Are Americans genetically inferior to Canadians, Germans, the French, Slovakians, and citizens of all those other countries where there are so many fewer gun deaths of of children? Do most Americans lack a kindness gene? Do they uniformly inherit murderous violence?

Is there something in our polluted air that contaminates American minds and hearts, making people blind to the suffering of others, ready to kill anyone, anything that gets in the way?

I think the answer to these questions is No, but clearly the country has a big problem with deadly violence–a correlate, I believe, of structural violence and the corrosive collusion of too many Americans with structural violence laced with racism.

Structural violence is what helps the rich get richer while the poor get poorer.  Structural violence means that the powerful get to make the rules in ways they believe (perhaps mistakenly) serve their own interests; if having desperate people available to remove their garbage and tar their roads, then you can be sure the powerful will limit educational opportunity, employment opportunity, and freedom of movement to keep a substantial segment of our society trapped in poverty, undereducated, and locked up or shot if they are in anyway noncompliant.  Or look too different.

When you combine social injustice and social inequality with anger, frustration, and the ready availability of guns, does that sound like a mix that can explode in violence? Does that violence have the potential of spilling over in ways that destroy countless lives, including those of children and adolescents? Seems like a Yes to me.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Sandy Hook Memorial
Sandy Hook Memorial
Photo by Bbjeter, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

On the one hand:

  • Under our beautiful for spacious skies, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT, on December 14, 2012—a horrifying number for one time and one place but apparently not horrifying enough.
  • Guns continue to be among the leading causes of death in the lives of American children and a large number of gun deaths go unreported.
  • From sea to shining sea, there were 23 more mass killings in the year after the massacre at Sandy Hook
  • In our land where purple mountains are majesties, daily and weekend reports of gun deaths of innocent people including children are available to all.  Read and weep.

On the other hand:

  • Although “America the Beautiful” urges Americans to “confirm thy soul in self-control, thy liberty in law!” liberty seems to have bamboozled law in Georgia’s new Safe Carry Protection Act of 2014 (also known as the “guns everywhere bill”), which will come into effect on July 1, 2014.

This bill, cloaked in the euphemistic language of “defending ourselves,” allows citizens with concealed carry permits , even if they have committed previous gun crimes, to take guns into some bars, churches, school zones, government buildings, and certain parts of airports. Will this make you feel more secure if you live in or travel to Georgia?

The NRA, thrilled with the law, will not be crowning our good with brotherhood; there’s too much innocent blood on their hands.

For further consideration:

Check out this horror story: Just one weekend’s worth of gun shootings.

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology