And ye shall inherit the whirlwind (or learn to live in gratitude and grace), Part 2

By Reverend Dr. Doe West

By Stefan Schindler

The vast majority of American citizens have been conditioned to think that democracy and capitalism are synonymous, and that socialism equals fascism.  To which we can apply Mark Twain’s observation: “Loyalty to petrified opinion never yet broke a chain or freed a human soul.”

John Lennon said: “I think our society is run by insane people for insane objectives.  I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends.  I think they’re all insane.  But I am liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.  That’s what is insane about it.”

Noam Chomsky notes: “I don’t know what word in the English language … applies to people who are willing to sacrifice the literal existence of organized human life so they can put a few more dollars into highly stuffed pockets.  The word ‘evil’ doesn’t even begin to approach it.”

Plato said in The Phaedo that “all wars are fought for the acquisition of wealth.”  Today, the American landscape is littered with statues of generals on stallions, while memorials to prophetic peacemakers are barely to be found.

War memorials abound, but where are the institutes for the study and practice of peace that could hold the promise of a better future?

Imperialism is the most potent and nefarious force in human history, and it haunts us today.  America has nearly a thousand military bases scattered across the globe, mostly in countries that don’t want them there.  New York calls itself “The Empire State;” and the Empire State Building on Fifth Avenue in New York City remains a popular tourist attraction, its very name unrecognized as a paean to the unrelenting violence, death and destruction of mega-wealth’s imperial ambitions.

Decade after decade, American students say history is the most boring subject in school.  Perhaps this would change if every history textbook began with Mark Twain’s observation that “America’s flag should be a skull-and-crossbones,” and if parents and students demanded to know why he said that, and teachers were sufficiently well-informed to provide an honest answer. 

The only sane and civil alternative to global capitalism gone amok is democratic ecosocialism, wherein citizens are keenly attuned to the lessons of history, respect and revere the biosphere, have ample time to continue their self-education, and are well-schooled in the critical thinking skills necessary to detect and refute sophistic speechifying.

A just society is committed to the well-being of all, and is therefore committed to egalitarian economics, universal healthcare, voluntary simplicity, free lifelong educational opportunity, preservation of natural resources, and a modest and well-tamed military overseen by “guardians” committed to peace.

Note from Kathie MM:

Pegean says, “”Joy is a form of resistance.” (Attributed to Maya Angelou)

And resistance can be joyful.

Is Peace a Taboo?

Which color is to be tabooed next? / Th. Nast. Abstract/medium: 1 print : wood engraving, 1882. This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1923. Author: Thomas Nast.

By Majed Ashy

Early anthropologists, such as Boas, and psychoanalysts such as Freud and Jung, discussed the anthropological and cultural origins of taboos. A taboo  is a social or religious custom prohibiting or restricting a particular practice or forbidding association with a particular person, place, or thing.” (Oxford Living Dictionary) Every society has taboos that are defined and reinforced, and sometimes exploited, by various social and political powers and cultural organizations, such as religions, media, educational systems, and governments. Generally, powers threaten and impose punishments on individuals and groups crossing the line of the prohibited taboo.

The same cultural and psychological dynamics at play throughout history to define something as a taboo can be seen as contributing to current obstacles to peace and peace making. In some societies, not only are whole classes of people or nations characterized as evil, but associating with them is a taboo, as are their cultural tools and practices, and the expression of positive thoughts and emotions towards them. Any effort towards peace with groups subjected to taboos can itself become a taboo,  surrounded by various myths and fears.

Through their cultural tools, the powers in society create the illusion of a collective agreement on the prohibition of peace with those “others,” and enforce their taboos with theological rationales, selective portrayals of the historical and current relations between the groups, and the particular meanings they assign to their own behavior and that of the others.

The same dynamics that frightened pre-historical humans regarding unseen “evil” spirits, and convinced them that there were powerful protectors in society with special knowledge about and weapons against those “enemies,” are still at play in today’s modern societies.

Understanding these cultural and psychological dynamics of taboo-making can help us free ourselves from being manipulated into viewing peace as a taboo.

Note from KMM: Ask yourself: Have our governments and other organizations made peace a taboo? Have there been efforts to punish individuals and groups who “cross the line” and try to promote peace? Is peaceful association with some groups and nations and respect for their customs and beliefs a taboo? What do people in power gain by tabooing particular groups? What can people do to protest against efforts to taboo the pursuit of peace and social justice?

A Day of Mother Earth: Living in Harmony with Nature


Mother Earth. Author: Frank Morrison

Note from KMM:  Here is a timely reminder to honor our mother. Please do it every day.

By  René Wadlow

 International Mother Earth Day on 22 April each year was established by the United Nations General Assembly in 2009.  Its aim is to promote living in harmony with Nature and to achieve a just balance among the economic, social and environmental needs of present and future generations.  The concept of living in harmony with Nature was seen by the U.N. delegates as a way “to improve the ethical basis of the relationship between humankind and our planet.”

The term “Mother Earth” is an expression used in different cultures to symbolize the inseparable bonds between humans and Nature.   Pachamama is the term used in the Andean cultures of South America.  The Earth and the ecosystem is our home.  We need to care for it as a mother is supposed to care for her children and the children to show love and gratitude in return.  However, we know from all the folk tales of the evil stepmother as well as the records of psychoanalytic sessions that mother-children relations are not always relations of love, care and gratitude.  Thus to really live in harmony with Nature requires deep shifts in values and attitudes, not just “sustainable development” projects.

The United Nations began its focus on ecological issues with the preparations for the 1972 Conference in Stockholm and has continued with the tfollowed by the Rio plus 20 conference 20 years later.  However the concept of living in harmony with Nature is relatively new as a U.N. political concept. Yet it is likely to be increasingly a theme for both governmental policy making and individual action.

As Rodney Collin wrote in a letter,

  “It is extraordinary how the key-word of harmony occurs everywhere now, comes intuitively to everyone’s lips when they wish to express  what they hope for.  But I feel that we have hardly yet begun to study its real meaning. Harmony is not an emotion, an effect.  It is a whole elaborate science, which for some reason has only been fully developed in the realm of sound.  Science, psychology and even religion are barely touching it as yet.”  (1)

Resolutions in the U.N. General Assembly can give a sense of direction.  They indicate that certain ideas and concepts are ready to be discussed at the level of governments.  However, a resolution is not yet a program of action or even a detailed framework for discussion.  “Living in harmony with Nature” is at that stage on the world agenda.  Since the start of the yearly observation of Mother Earth Day in 2010, there have been useful projects proposed around a yearly theme.  The 2018 theme is to reduce pollution from plastics.  The exponential growth of plastics is now a real threat by injuring marine life, littering beaches and landfills and clogging waste systems.  There is a need to reduce the single use of plastic objects by reusing and recycling plastic  objects.

However reducing pollution from plastic objects, while useful, is not yet living in harmony with Nature.  There is still efforts to be made to spell out the ethical base and the necessary shifts in attitudes and actions.

NOTES:

1) His letters have been assembled after his death by his wife into a book:

Rodney Collin. The Theory of Conscious Harmony  (Boulder, CO: Shambhala, 1958)

_______________________________________________

René Wadlow is a member of the Fellowship of Reconciliation’s Task Force on the Middle East, president and U.N. representative (Geneva) of the Association of World Citizens, and editor of Transnational Perspectives. He is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment.

 

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 23 Apr 2018.

TMS: A Day of Mother Earth: Living in Harmony with Nature,