Why We saved Private Ryan

by Kathie MM

In our troubled times, where do you turn to escape from the depressing and frightening corporate media news? Many people turn to alcohol; increasing numbers turn to other deadly drugs. Indeed, problems of addiction are multiplying relentlessly. 

You probably know about the toll both legal and illegal drugs are taking on society but did you ever think about  one of the less obvious addictions readily available to anyone with a television?  I’m talking about an addiction that captures people across race, age, social class, and politics, the  addiction so readily provided by Hollywood—that is, violent films, including war films, wherein violence is glorified (despite pseudo-messages purporting to condemn it).  Along with military industrial profiteers, we have film profiteers, the ones who exploit the fact that for many people, engagement in violence—in person or by proxy– is one of the cheaper thrills they can obtain. And believe me, all those profiteers are in cahoots with each other.

Think of the “Blockbuster films” you’ve seen (if indeed you’re a movie-goer and have been seduced into going to a blockbuster). How many of them portrayed violence, glorified violence, in gory detail? In how many did the “good guys” use just as much violence as the “bad guys”? How often could you differentiate between good guys and bad guys based on how much violence they used? In how many was violence applauded as good, honorable, justified when done by the “right side”? And even if there were frightening scenes, how often did those scenes leave you feeling excited?  Let’s face it, many films awash in violence have “good guys” providing multiple justifications for their violence while revving up your endorphins and making you just itch to do something–all for big bucks to the producers.

Fortunately all tools, including words and images, can be used to promote peace as well as violence and to educate as well as anesthetize,  as illustrated in our fourth example today of one of Jonny Lewis’s short comedy antiwar films.

Note from Kathie MM: Pegean says,  Don’t miss the text at the end of the film.  Eat it up. Food for thought.

She also asks, Did you see Saving Private Ryan? If so, what did you feel and think about it? Please let us know your response to Spielberg’s movie as well as your response to Jonnie’s video here on this site.

You can’t have one without the other

Washington, DC December 16, 2010 This is a group of Minnesotans who traveled to Washington DC to join a demonstration against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Over 100 were arrested in front of the White House. The event was endorsed by groups such as: Veterans For Peace, ANSWER Coalition, CODEPINK, Fellowship of Reconciliation, March Forward!, Peace of the Action, United National Antiwar Committee, Voices for Creative Nonviolence, War Resisters League, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, World Can’t Wait. his file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Author: Fibonacci Blue

By Kathie MM

 Regarding love and marriage, Dad was told by mother, you can’t have one without the other.

In the sophisticated 21st century, we know that what the song was really about was sex and marriage, but one could argue that the essential link between the two is love.

Well, similar things can be said about peace and social justice.  You can’t have peace without social justice, and the essential link is love for humanity and the earth, expressed through activism.

Think about the huge profits the military industrial complex reaps from warfare,  arms sales,  military bases, and “defense” budgets. How does one shake their dedication to promoting targets for rage on the home front in order to serve their desire to keep the country in perpetual armed conflict against designated enemies within and outside national borders?  It is pretty obvious that the MIC will not give up their billions easily;  active protest is essential.

To reintroduce our new series emphasizing the intimate connection between peace and social justice, today’s offering is a reincarnation of one of engaging peace’s first posts back in 2011.

 Negative versus positive definitions of peace

Posted on May 16, 2011 by kathiemm

*Negative peace refers to definitions that identify peace with the absence of war or armed conflict.

*Positive peace refers to definitions that focus on the prerequisites and criteria for a sustainable peace, including respect for universal human rights (which are not synonymous with the legal rights granted by any particular legal authority).

The major public media in this country certainly do little to promote the idea of peace per se, let alone positive peace.

A report released by the Institute for Economics and Peace in October 2010 described a study regarding violence and peace in television programs. Included in the research were 37 news and current affairs programs from 23 networks in 15 countries, including the United States.

Overall, only 1.6% of the stories examined in the study considered issues of positive peace. However, there was some variation across the countries in amount of media time devoted to issues of violence. According to the report, “Of the 10 TV programs with the highest level of violence coverage, 8 are from the United States or the United Kingdom.”

Do you think there have been any changes in our culture of violence since 2011?  Do you see any signs of resistance to the business as usual of hatred and violence?  What actions, what protests, are you aware of in our society today that might contribute to resistance to endless war and social injustice at every level of society?  Please share your ideas.

CHILD’S PLAY?

Children play with an electronically-driven Gatling gun aboard USS Makin Island Oct. 9, 2010. This image or file is in the public domain. Author: Marines from Arlington, VA, United States.

by Kathie MM

While my younger siblings and I were growing up, my mom wrote regular letters to her mom down in Florida about our adventures, mishaps, squabbles, reconciliations, etc.

The letter below, written by my mom on February 6, 1948, just a few years after WWII ended, strikes  me as an odd harbinger of my later life as a peace activist. I am hoping for your comments.

At the time Mom wrote this letter, I was 7 and my brother Teddy was 5.

“At bath time tonight, as I collected clean clothes for the next day, I could hear Kathie and her brother playing a new game. Teddy, at one end of the tub, was America; Kathie was England at the other. A large pan was a boat that sailed back and forth carrying toys from America to the poor children in England.

 Before Teddy went to bed, Kathie wanted to train him to be a soldier.

“Do all boys go to war?” she asked me.

“Most of them, if there is a war, and if there’s nothing wrong with them.”

“What do you mean?”

“Well, if their eyes are all right and that sort of thing.”

 “Gee, Teddy, “, Kathie said, “You’re lucky! You’ll be able to go to war. You’re not blind and you haven’t got a broken leg or anything.”

 “I don’t want to go to war,” Teddy said. “With all those guns I might get killed.”

“Oh Teddy! You don’t understand,” Kathie replied. Then she said uncertainly to me, “Right, Mummy?”

 Not understanding wars myself, my sympathies were with her brother.

 We decided to make a sailor out of Teddy, so Kathie could train him whether there was a war or not.”

 This interchange took place before television and computers, before the universalizing of violent images and ads for glorified weapons; yet there was “war,” apparently part of our everyday vocabulary, with all the deadly questions it raised.

Yet alongside the banality of war in our childish conversations,  we played out our awareness of the “care packages” our parents sent to refugees in post-war Europe—including to Germany, which led, quite astonishingly, 20 years later, to a young German man coming to our home to thank us personally for the package we had sent to his family so long ago.

Somehow, out of this mix. my siblings and I all became anti-war advocates,  but still,  I fear for the future.

What did it do to our society to rear kids to take war for granted? What does it do to today’s children  to have images of weapons flooding their TVs and computers? What does it do for humanity when refugees are portrayed as enemies? What does it do for survival when the poor and people of color become the new cannon fodder, and when the fruits of the earth become sacrificed to the greed of the most unscrupulous of the rich and powerful?

 None of it seems like child’s play to me.