Forewarned is Forearmed: Get Ready for Political Mind Games in 2019. Part 2

Image licensed under CCA-Share Alike 4.0 Internatl. Culture Jam activism sticker mentored by Avram Finkelstein, Center for Artistic Activism. Author: BettyTkao.

by Roy Eidelson

[One percenter mind games continued from December 26, 2018]

Distrust

“They’re Devious and Dishonest.”  From condemning labor activists to vilifying racial justice advocates, one-percenters will portray their adversaries as treacherous, devious, and evil in intent. With this mind game, they’ll encourage us to be suspicious and unsympathetic toward those who are facing difficult circumstances or insurmountable hardships. When this appeal works, we’re more likely to turn our backs on the victims of the self-aggrandizing rich and powerful.

“They’re Different from Us.” Whether they’re stigmatizing immigrant groups or progressive reformers, the 1% will describe those they deplore as unworthy of our trust, casting them as different and out of touch with what most Americans want. Whenever this deceitful ploy is successful, it leads potential allies to view each other as adversaries. In this way, natural coalitions that could develop among individuals and groups opposed to today’s plutocrats are squelched or destroyed.

“They’re Misguided and Misinformed.”  From the corruption on Wall Street to the further militarization of foreign policy, one-percenters will argue that their critics are misinformed and unreliable, and that their judgments are not to be trusted. Whenever we’re persuaded by such defensive appeals, we discount or entirely disregard important voices of dissent. Crucial opportunities for tackling inequality and advancing the common good are lost as a result.

“Trust Us.”  Whether it’s billionaire union-busters or lobby-backed politicians, the 1% will promote themselves as paragons of integrity. They know their efforts and policies will be much harder to counter if we mistakenly view them as trustworthy and selfless in word and deed. The weight of evidence doesn’t support this favorable image, but that reality doesn’t matter if we fail to recognize their devious misrepresentations, hollow promises, and corrupt enterprises.

Superiority

“They’re Losers.”  From reviling the homeless to disparaging the unemployed, today’s plutocrats will portray those who are down-and-out as inferior to the rest of us. With this mind game, they’ll encourage us to stand aloof from decent people who deserve our compassion and solidarity. And by boosting our own sense of self-worth, they’ll aim to discourage us from recognizing that the massive concentrations of wealth and power in this country reflect ruthless exploitation and unconscionable disregard of the needy.

“We’ve Earned It.”  Whether CEOs are defending their astronomical pay or claiming the mantle of indispensable job creators, one-percenters will fraudulently argue that they’ve earned everything they have through determination and fair play—and that they deserve our praise rather than criticism for their actions and choices. These assertions of superiority go hand in hand with the pursuit of ever greater dominance. As long as their self-glorifying narratives go uncontested, extreme inequality will remain a disturbing fixture of our society.

“Pursuing a Higher Purpose.”  From promoting inequality-boosting right-to-work legislation to defending human rights abuses, the 1% will insist that their actions embrace and protect the values we cherish. But prioritizing big-money interests subverts the vision of a nation of equal opportunity, where people from all walks of life join together for the common good. Despite this glaring contradiction, greed-driven appeals often succeed because they tap into our sense of pride over our country’s accomplishments and influence in the world.

“They’re Un-American.”  Whether they’re railing against desperate immigrants or kneeling football players, one-percenters will stoke intolerance by presenting their critics as inauthentic and unpatriotic Americans. They recognize that their rule will be jeopardized if unwelcome change-seekers gain broad support. So they’ll condemn those individuals and groups that refuse to silently accept hardship and mistreatment, characterizing them as ungrateful outsiders who fail to appreciate all that’s good about the United States.

Helplessness

“Change Is Impossible.”  From catastrophic climate change to inequality-boosting globalization, the 1% will insist that the world is shaped by forces much too powerful to be tamed by human intervention. Closer analysis, however, reveals that they lack the motivation—not the capacity—to exert influence over these disturbing phenomena. Indeed, even when they’re not the direct cause of others’ misery, too often they’re bystanders unwilling to use their enormous resources to benefit the common good.

“We’ll All Be Helpless.”  Whether they’re opposing gun reform measures or minimum wage hikes, one-percenters will warn us that changes will produce harmful repercussions that we’ll all be powerless to combat. The goal is to frighten us into accepting a status quo that serves their own interests but causes widespread damage to the public good. They hope that concerns about future helplessness will lead us to turn our backs on those suffering under the current system.

“Don’t Blame Us.”  From environmental disasters at home to reckless militarism overseas, the 1% will be quick to claim there’s nothing they could do when circumstances take a turn for the worse. Given their inordinate wealth and power, these cries of helplessness and blamelessness merit careful scrutiny. Although they strut the stage boasting about their purported talents and accomplishments, today’s plutocrats head for the shadows when it’s time to accept responsibility for their policy failures.

“Resistance Is Futile.”  Whether it’s protecting tax cuts for billionaires or flooding political campaigns with cash for future favors, the 1% will try to convince us that we’re helpless to wrest our lives and our country from their control. If we believe we’ll never succeed, our change efforts grind to a halt. But we should remember that one-percenters are susceptible to the disempowering effects of perceived helplessness too—if we can demonstrate our own collective power.

Resisting the 1%’s Mind Games

To reiterate: Any effective strategy for turning the tide on the 1% in 2019 depends upon countering and neutralizing these mind games. Concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness deserve to be important guides in policy debates and in efforts to advance the general welfare. But today’s plutocrats cunningly exploit these concerns solely for their own benefit, disregarding the harmful consequences that befall everyone else.

What, then, can we do? First, we should understand that the 1%’s mind games are much like a rampant virus that can infect unsuspecting people with false and democracy-endangering beliefs. Second, we should take the steps necessary to psychologically inoculate ourselves. That’s best accomplished by learning to recognize these flawed, manipulative appeals wherever they appear—in the media or in our neighborhoods—and by preparing forceful counter-arguments to them. And third, having become skilled “first responders,” we should organize others in our communities to do the same. The mission starts now.

Roy Eidelson, PhD, is a past president of Psychologists for Social Responsibility, a member of the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology, and the author of the new book POLITICAL MIND GAMES: How the 1% Manipulate Our Understanding of What’s Happening, What’s Right, and What’s Possible. His website is www.royeidelson.com and he’s on Twitter at @royeidelson

This article was originally published on Counterpunch at https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/12/20/get-ready-for-these-political-mind-games-in-2019/

Militarize police against terrorists? Bad idea.

 

Tom Zbikowski, Fort Walton Beach, Fla., Police Department SWAT team member, walks the hallways in Campbell Township Elementary School at the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center, Butlerville, Ind., while portraying an active shooter during the 2015 Air Force Research Laboratory Commanders Challenge, June 15-19. Four members from the SWAT team participated in the challenge playing the role of emergency responders in addition to the active shooter. (U.S. Air Force photo by Wesley Farnsworth)

Whether you are a privileged student in a good university, a parent of small children, a kid, a grandmother, or any of the other types of ordinary people in this country, you should be worried about the increasing militarization of the police.

The police are human beings. That means they are subject to all kinds of influences, just like everybody else; for some of them, their families, their communities, and the media to which they have been exposed have made them angry, frightened, violent, hateful, bigoted.  These traits are pretty scary in anyone, but particularly in people with guns.  Especially big guns, rapidly firing guns, guns with no brains or morals.

And because they are human, police can also make mistakes. Huge mistakes.

You all know about Ferguson, Missouri, and similar nationally-recognized episodes starring militarized police but even Ferguson has its less well known stories.

There are probably thousands of other examples of police misuse of their increasingly militarized power—and the limited sanctions that ensue from their misuse– that led to tragedy.

For example, read this brief TruthOut article for five really outrageous examples of SWAT raids gone wrong.

As is true of so many social problems, efforts are being made to rein in the abuses of a militarized police force .

If enough people become involved, perhaps we can reduce the progress towards 1984 in 2015 and beyond.

 

It’s indecent for these guys to share a bed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH25VEmWLmo&feature=player_embedded

Cool, huh? An 11-man SWAT team, heavily armed, yelling, swearing, breaking in an open door, and throwing flash bang grenades, raids a house and (pant, pant) captures a 68-year-old grandmother and her adopted daughter. Whoops, wrong house.

Viewing this video really steamed me up. It was another unneeded reminder of the issues that obsess me everyday anyway. Militarization of police. Unnecessary force. Guns, guns, guns. Violation of civil rights. Violation of human rights. Inhumane behavior.

But the steam that built up in me was nothing compared with the sense of outrage, disbelief, and anger I felt when I watched this second brief video, a newscast report by a member of the local TV network invited to come along with the SWAT team and see them in action.

What happened to the free press? David Shepherd, the so-called reporter for this story, seems more like the “bought press,” or the “seduced press.” Here is a blatant example of what can happen when people whose job it is to report the news become “embedded” in the action.

I was less steamed and could only laugh when I read a report on the raid in Police: The Law Enforcement Magazine, entitled “Ind. SWAT Team Tricked Into Raiding Grandma’s Home”. The moral of the story seems to be that the raid, the intimidation, the destruction of property was not the fault of the police who did those things. They were tricked into it.

A lot of people in this country go nuts in response to particular forms of coupling (white with black, men with men, etc.) It is the increasing tendency of coupling between members of the press  and gun-bearing members of the power structure that makes me nervous.

The good news is that the grandmother filed a law suit and the judge ruled that the SWAT team does not get immunity from prosecution.

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology

What’s so bad about the Ferguson, MO, shooting, anyway?

20140821060210!Lt_Ray_Albers_points_rifle_in_Ferguson
St. Ann Police Lieutenant points rifle at civilians in Ferguson, MO. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. Work by Darmokand.

So what’s the big deal about Ferguson police shooting an unarmed black man?

Aren’t people getting shot by the police in this country all the time without even a ripple of attention in the mainstream media? Aren’t they disproportionately black? Aren’t they often unarmed?

It’s really difficult to get solid answers to these questions but there is good evidence that the answer to all of them is “Yes!”  Still, the attention to Ferguson is important for a number of reasons: The shootings and subsequent police response to protesters are symptoms of much larger problems, and like most symptoms (e.g., chills, fevers), violent behaviors can be signs of more than one illness.

For example, the lethal police actions in Ferguson are symptomatic of several pathologies that ought not to be ignored:

*rampant racism, which disproportionately kills people of color and is life-threatening in many ways less obvious than the firing of guns.

*erosion of gains made during the Civil Rights Movement, as described here by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

*this country’s glorification of violence

*the turning of civilian police forces into swat teams and other sorts of military units

So, there’s a lot that’s bad about Ferguson and all it represents.

Most of you know that ignoring symptoms (e.g., the cough that accompanies smoking, the weight gain that accompanies poor eating habits, the mindless behavior that can follow excessive drinking) can lead to worsening problems.  What kinds of problems can you foresee from ignoring the symptoms that Ferguson exposed?