Dear Chairman Kim Jung-un

This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Author: Luca Casartelli

by Lewis Randa, Director, The Peace Abbey

What follows is a letter for President Donald Trump to consider sending to Chairman of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Kim Jung-un.

Please feel free to add, edit, or delete and submit your own letter to the White House.

Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness of war. 

My “mind game” candle in the darkness is dedicated to Yoko Ono.

From The White House

Dear Chairman Kim Jung-un,

I am reaching out in an effort to de-escalate the hostility and aggression between our two governments.  Our peoples, the millions of families, the loving parents and their children dream of a better life, both in North Korea and in North America, and are counting on us to be prudent as we seek solutions to what appears to be intractable distrust and animosity which could lead to war.  Our histories reflect different paths of development and periods of conflict, yet our goals are not dissimilar.  Both our nations want what is best for our country, our people, and the Earth.

Mr. Chairman, I would like to point out what you already know, and that is this: A nuclear confrontation would not only be catastrophic for both our nations, the blast damage would result in massive destruction and the death toll would be unimaginable. Most importantly, it would have an endless, negative impact on our planet’s ability to sustain the conditions for life.

Were either of us to preemptively launch a nuclear weapon or retaliate with one, the impact on the planet would be irreversible and condemn those who survive with the cancerous effects of millions of tons of radioactive pollutants in the atmosphere.  The unprecedented infusion of contamination that would result from nuclear explosion would spread to form a stratospheric cloud layer that would block sunlight for years to come.

Extensive changes to the environment would affect our ability to sustain global food production and the ​massive damage to the ozone layer would allow dangerous levels of ultraviolet radiation to reach the Earth’s surface.

We must not allow this to happen.

To avoid a nuclear exchange, ​I wish to make official the new policy of the United States:  The U.S. will not preemptively use a nuclear weapon against your nation or any sovereign state for any reason whatsoever.  To do so would undermine millions of years of evolution of life on Earth.

And to demonstrate the sincerity of this commitment, I will order the end of all US – South Korean military exercises off the coast of North Korea.  I will also end all flights over your country, realizing that such flights, while being aerial reconnaissance that our military deems necessary, only provokes additional fear and ​distrust toward ​the United States.

​In addition, I will order the U.S. Treasury to transfer ten billion dollars in food commodities to the North Korean​ government as a gesture of goodwill.

In return, I would need assurances that your government will cease all future development of nuclear weaponry and testing and the launching of missiles over sovereign nations in the Pacific or elsewhere in the world.  This would need to be verified by the United Nations Nuclear Weapons Inspectors.   Henceforth, the United States will recognize the nuclear capability of North Korea.

This commitment offers a new start in circumventing​ a cataclysm that would leave the Earth uninhabitable.

Upon receipt of this letter, and your positive response, I will notify the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of State​ of the above efforts to de-escalate the tension with Pyongyang.

May our next step be ​movement towards worldwide abolishment of nuclear weapons and the lifting of all sanctions on North Korea that are of a civilian nature.

Sincerely,

Donald J. Trump

Global Resources and Challenges for 2016 ©

guest author: Anthony J. Marsella, Ph.D.

The new calendar year is upon us . . . in every sense of the word!  We use the New Year as an opportunity for renewal — a chance for a fresh start. We leave behind the accumulate residue of the past year, and respond now with a blank slate of possibilities — an imagined vision of what could be . . . “If only.”  Yes, it is the “If only,” constraining us and inspiring us.  I once wrote a wisdom bite:  “If!  A two-letter word, simple in sound, profound in consequence.”

So here we are!  Wanting a new start, but clear we have much unfinished business from last year.  There is wisdom in knowing the challenges we face, for life is never free of them. It is also useful to know the resources we possess, even if they may be inadequate to the task. It is useful to explore the dynamics of resource-challenge relations.  There will always be tradeoffs and compromises, and these are disappointing. Yet, they constitute a reality that cannot be ignored.  So what does 2016 look like from the resource-challenge perspective?

ResoursesAnInterdependentConfluenceOfEvents

In my opinion, there are reasons for fear, and reasons for hope.  Has it ever been anything different? Hasn’t history shown us each age was filled with its challenges and resources? Yes, this is true.  But what is different this year – 2016 – is the “global stage” in which the challenges and resources are being tested and contested. We are unprepared for the magnitude of stage.  And, the problem is resources are always fewer in number than challenges. But is their power less?

There is something noble and inspirational about the willingness to assert human and environmental dignity and worth via various resources.  There is something noble about joining causes to bring positive changes.  This may be the most important thing! It is hard to speak of the nobility of the human spirit when we consider the widespread abuses and insults human have engendered.  But perhaps the “process” of responding to challenges reminds us of the essence of life itself – a felt force seeking and pursuing, not only survival, but growth, development, and becoming.  Go for it!

Anthony J. Marsella, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822.

Show, by your actions, that you choose peace over war, freedom over oppression, voice over silence, service over self-interest, respect over advantage, courage over fear, cooperation over competition, action over passivity, diversity over uniformity, and justice over all.

Militarization and the future of life (Earth Day, Part 2)

As we discussed in our Earth Day post, the environment is both a casualty and cause of war.  It’s time for the peace and environmental movements to join hands in solidarity. A number of organizations are working at the intersection of these important efforts.

Environment and security:Earth from space

Promoting environmental conservation as a means to peace:

Education for peace and environment:

Legal aspects of war and the environment:

Environmental and human health effects of war:

Anti-war activists can profit by understanding the causes and consequences of war from the perspective of ecological systems. Similarly, the sustainability movement will be well-served by acknowledging the profound effect that militarization has on the future of all life on earth.

Pat Daniel, Ph.D., Managing Editor of Engaging Peace

Earth Day during wartime (Part 1)

Sunday, April 22, is Earth Day. Today we honor the Earth by calling attention to the common goals of the peace and environmental sustainability movements.

But first, some context: Assessing the impact of war on the environment can be fraught with complexity, but here is a sampling of those effects:

It works the other way, too–that misuse, destruction, and scarcity of natural resources can be the cause of war.  Examples include conflicts over oil in the Middle East, rare metals in the Congo, food shortages and water scarcity in South Asia and throughout the world. More and more, climate disruption is becoming or is predicted (pdf) to be a source of conflict.

In other words, environmental degradation is a threat to global security.

As you celebrate Earth Day on Sunday, please consider what it will take to stop the intertwined scourges of warfare and environmental destruction. Even more important, make a commitment to do something about them.

Pat Daniel, Ph.D., Managing Editor of Engaging Peace