Taking responsibility for one’s own behavior: Yom Kippur

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison: Today we welcome another guest post from Dr. Hilda Perlitsh, a social psychologist with expertise in the areas of organizational psychology, career development, and cross-cultural issues.]

Jews praying in the synagogue on Yom Kippur by Maurycy Gottlieb
Jews praying in the synagogue on Yom Kippur by Maurycy Gottlieb (Image in public domain)

Yom Kippur,” Hebrew for “Day of Atonement,” instituted in Biblical times, mandated in Leviticus, is considered to be the most significant holy day of the year among the Jewish people.

This ancient, enduring observance completes a 10 day period, the High Holy Days or “Days of Awe,” which begins at the New Year, Rosh Hashanah.

During this period behaviors towards others and to G-d are examined and one engages in reflection and repentance. G-d inscribes each person’s fate in the “Book of Life” for the coming year and these decisions are “sealed” at the end of Yom Kippur.

The day itself is characterized as a “complete Sabbath” prescribing “prayer, repentance and charity,” requiring a 25 hour fast, and abstinence from labor and pleasures. The Yom Kippur service includes the recitation of comprehensive lists of sins and petitions of forgiveness.

The Jewish tradition is very clear about differentiating types of sins; petitions to relieve sins that are addressed to G-d only pertain to the individual’s relationship to G-d such as any vows made against G-d (as during forced conversions during the Inquisition). Transgressions committed against persons must be settled with those persons; G-d does not forgive sins committed against other people.

The lists of sins in the traditional prayer service address mistreatment of others especially in the use of language (e.g. falsehoods, slander, humiliations). Even if one has personally not committed any sins, redress for others in the community is prayed for.

Yom Kippur begins at sundown with the chanting of the “Kol Nidre” prayer which seeks annulment of vows against G-d, and closes with the “Ni’elah” service which signifies the “closing of the gates” for the inscriptions for the year ahead, followed by a long blast of the Shofar, a ram’s horn.

The theme of “T’Shuvah” translated as repentance, more precisely “return”, is central and interpreted as the recognition of free will and the imperative to struggle with and take personal responsibility for one’s behavior.[1] Redemption includes the tasks of: addressing the world’s oppressed, teaching compassion, giving charity for less fortunate others, being just and loving mercy.

This holy period prescribes processes that enjoin each person to chart a corrective course at the beginning of every Jewish New Year and thus provides the basic scaffold for the moral framework of Jewish civilization.

The challenges embodied in the “Days of Awe” are built on various strands of human strivings, codified into Jewish law and traditions, transmitted into and joining the civilizing thrusts of other beliefs and traditions…..towards the continuous repair of the world: “Tikun Olam”.


[1] Meditation, page 106….”.surely our deeds do not pass away unrecorded. Every word, every act inscribes itself in the Book of Life. Freely we choose and what we have chosen to become stands in judgment over what we may yet hope to be. In our choices we are not always free. But if only we make the effort to turn, every force of goodness, within and without, will help us, while we live, to escape that death of the heart which leads to sin.” Gates of Repentance: the New Union Prayerbook for the Days of Awe”. Central Conference of American Rabbis: New York, 1978, revised 1996.

Hilda D. Perlitsh, Ph.D., Clinical Associate Professor of Psychology, Boston University

Simply incompatible with American principles

Review of Matthew Alexander’s How to break a terrorist: The U.S. interrogators who used brains, not brutality, to take down the deadliest man in Iraq

By Judith Prueitt-Prentice

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison: Today we are happy to publish a book review by Judith Prueitt-Prentice, who has a Masters in Family Studies,  a special interest in social justice issues, and took my course in the Psychology of War and Peace in the summer of 2011.]

“Torture is counterproductive to keeping America safe and it doesn’t matter if we do it or if we pass it off to another government. The result is the same. And morally, I believe, there is an even stronger argument. Torture is simply incompatible with American principles.” (Alexander, 2008)

The ticking time bomb scenario is a familiar theme in TV and film dramas featuring terrorists. Jack Bower, the reluctant FBI agent in the popular TV series 24 hours, races against the clock to foil deadly anti-government plots. He has a choice:  follow the rules, or beat the crap out of this week’s villain to get the codes to disarm the bomb. Nine times out of ten, the bleeding cowardly terrorist coughs up the codes with seconds to spare and New York, scene of the worst terrorist attack in US history, is made safe once again. Or is it?

In How to Break a Terrorist, Matthew Alexander (a pseudonym),  a seasoned solider, police investigator, and US Army interrogator, describes how he used soft interrogation styles, including knowledge of local culture, negotiation, and compassion, rather than “old school” fear and control, to gain information in hundreds of interrogations.

It was his information, Alexander says, that led to the location of Abu Musab Al  Zarqawi, suspected of being the number two man in Al Qaida, the terrorist organization blamed for the 9/11 attacks on New York’s World Trade Center.

Alexander is openly critical of the enhanced interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration. He believes more American lives have been lost in Iraq due to the use of torture than were lost in the 9/11 attacks.

Alexander’s  book is exciting. It describes webs of intrigue, lies told on both sides, and the often sad true stories of ordinary people who choose to become terrorists in a world of terror.