Extolling WHOM

The 10¢ Columbian. Columbus Presenting Natives, 2 January 1893, US Post Office
This work is in the public domain in the United States

Today I am enjoying what appears to be a disappearing commodity: the three day weekend.

But, I am not celebrating the “accomplishments” of Christopher Columbus, who chanced on the Americas in his quest for riches and found them in his own form of “brown gold” i.e., the native peoples of the long-inhabited “New World,” whom he captured and sold or gave away in the thousands.

How can one honor such a man?

* On encountering the native people on the island he named San Salvador, he wrote, on October 14, 1492, “When your Highnesses so command, they could all be carried off to Castile or be held captive in the island itself because with 50 men they could all be subjugated and compelled to do anything one wishes.”

* On further exposure to the gentle native people, he wrote on December 16, 1492,  “They have no weapons and are all naked without any skill in arms and are very cowardly so that a thousand would not challenge three.… Thus they are useful to be commanded and to be made to labor and sow and to do everything else of which there is need and build towns.…”

* On February 2, 1494, he dispatched 12 ships with a cargo of slaves—nearly half of whom died during the voyage—to be sold in the slave market at Seville.

I find no honor in such deeds or in the reign of terror Columbus unleashed on the people of the Americas. On this day (known in many places as Indigenous People’s Day) I join in honoring the native peoples who survived  Columbus’s assault on their homes and families. 

It is time to apologize and make amends.

Globalization for good (Globalization, Part 2)

Arab Spring collage
Arab Spring collage, from Wikimedia Commons. Used under CC Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Liberal economists—the ones ballyhooing about the benefits of unfettered capitalism–have gleefully co-opted the term “globalization.” [See Forbes article]. It is this form of globalization–the one of which the multinational corporations and financial institutions are so proud–that has kept multitudes of people in near or literal slavery.

Globalization, however, involves much more than economic profits and losses, ruthless greed and numbing poverty.

Consider, for example, the United Nations. Lots of folks argue that it is an unwieldy bureaucracy failing to fulfill its mission, yet it has globalized the idea of human rights. This  achievement—anathema to the international corporate power structure–helped to change the face of the globe, and helped to free the colonies that survived not just the First but also the Second World War.

Moreover, that process has continued. Global transmission of values such as human rights, democracy, and self-determination has been fostered by globalization of systems of communication, including the social media.

The globalization of forms of quick communication is a double-edged sword, however. It can be used to promote violence as in the Rwandan genocide. It can be used by governments to spy on everyone, as in the case of the National Security Agency (NSA).  But it can also be used to promote nonviolent resistance to vicious dictators, as in much of the Arab Spring movement, and to alert people around the world to horrors being perpetrated far from their homes.

Globalization is like knowledge—it can be used for good or ill. Our goal should be globalization for good.

Kathie Malley-Morrison, Professor of Psychology

Perspectives on peace (Perspective-taking, part 1)

[Note from Kathie Malley-Morrison:  Today we welcome the first of several contributions by Sherri Nevada McCarthy, a member of the Engaging Peace board of directors. Dr. McCarthy is a professor of psychology at Northern Arizona University-Yuma, and has published widely in the area of international psychology. She is co-editor with me of two upcoming volumes to be published by Springer Publishing: International Handbook of Governmental Aggression and International Handbook of Peace.]

Drawing of two faces with dots overhead, suggesting they are thinking about each other

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, asserts that all of humanity is entitled to a social and international order in which all safely co-exist, free from torture, slavery, threat or discrimination.

Still, more than 60 years later, many on our planet live in fear of genocide, invasion and other threats. Discrimination persists. Despite good intentions, rights are sometimes taken away by the very people who claim to be upholding them.

Why is this, and what can each of us do to help prevent it?

Psychologists have identified several mechanisms that may help to shed some light on these questions. Albert Bandura’s mechanisms of moral disengagement, previously discussed on this blog, are one example. Another is the concept of “perspective-taking.”

Perspective-taking has been widely researched over the years by both developmental and social psychologists. Developmental psychologist Robert Selman identified stages of perspective-taking that develop as children mature, and many tests of children’s cognitive and social competence used today incorporate these stages. (In future posts, we will explore Selman’s work in more detail.)

Perspective-taking, or the ability to see things from another’s point of view, is essential for social competence. Without this ability, people would remain unable to relate to the needs, interests or rights of others. Reasoning would also be impaired—especially about ideas such as justice and fairness.

It is worth noting that knowledge of another’s perspective does not guarantee that we will ensure human rights. This knowledge could instead be used to manipulate or harm. Still, being able to discern and understand the points of view of others is an important skill in peaceful conflict resolution. Finding ways to make sure this ability develops, whether in the schools or through other means, is an important first step toward engaging peace.

Sherri Nevada McCarthy, Ph.D.